I love Pinot Grigio. I don't go for the whole Pinot Grigio/Pinot Gris naming thing, but I do like the grape. Still, I've yet to come across a good, cheap Pinot Grigio.
So why risk disapointment again? It's non vintage and non regional, two important aspects to guide me to wines I think I'll like.
Vintage not for a specific vintage, but to see if the wine is fresh, or has a bit of age, it gives you an idea of the taste profile.
Region because that's the way the modern wine world is going. For premium regions anyway. Boutique areas suitable to a handful of particular grape varietals. The old world has been doing this for centuries, but then they've had a bit of a head start to work it out.
But this wine had neither. And still I bought it.
California was the appellation and non vintage, However $9.99 was the seductive price, and it succeded. Without a vintage on the label I'd assume it's a mega-blend bought on the free market or left over from superior labels, blended a couple of times a year.
However because I ignored my first instincts, I succeeded in picking up quite a nice little drop.
Mineral and lychee with a slight sweetness of honey and jasmine. Good structure, clean and crisp with a tight finish. Not complex or thought provoking, but neither was the price.
It's also not something you want to drink with lunch, as you'll probably find yourself in the same place many hours later telling some stranger why you want to marry the person over there, even though you've never met them. It's very easy to drink.
So while I'll probably shell out another $5 for this wine it will remain a bit of a party trick. Not something I'd share because of it's quality, but because it's so enjoyable and so cheap. It's already got a home in our fridge as a 'just another night' wine.
